Apoio: Patriarcado de Lisboa, Congregação de São José de Cluny, Solar do Castelo/Hotéis Heritage Lisboa
Monday, November 7, 2011
O concerto de 4 de Novembro na Igreja do Menino Deus
Apoio: Patriarcado de Lisboa, Congregação de São José de Cluny, Solar do Castelo/Hotéis Heritage Lisboa
Sunday, November 6, 2011
FALSA REABILITAÇÃO: a patética "nova" antiga Engomadoria Ramiro Leão
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
300 anos da Igreja do Menino Deus: Concerto dia 4 de Novembro 21H
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Friday, October 21, 2011
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Thursday, October 13, 2011
United Stares of Narcissism: Rua dos Fanqueiros
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
JARDIM BOTÂNICO DE LISBOA NO WATCH de 2012 da World Monuments Fund!
PLATAFORMA EM DEFESA DO JARDIM BOTÂNICO DE LISBOA:
Monday, October 10, 2011
Thursday, October 6, 2011
JARDIM BOTÂNICO DE LISBOA NO OBSERVATÓRIO MUNDIAL DOS MONUMENTOS
Lisboa, 6 de Outubro de 2011
WORLD MONUMENTS FUND COLOCA JARDIM BOTÂNICO DE LISBOA NO OBSERVATÓRIO MUNDIAL DOS MONUMENTOS
Jardim Botânico de Lisboa seleccionado para a WORLD MONUMENTS WATCH de 2012. Lista anunciada publicamente em Nova Iorque.
A WORLD MONUMENTS FUND (WMF) é a mais importante organização privada, sem fins lucrativos, dedicada à preservação de lugares da herança cultural de todo o mundo. Através da sua lista bienal World Monuments Watch, a WMF (http://www.wmf.org/) chama atenção internacional para os perigos que ameaçam os lugares com grande significado histórico, artístico e arquitectónico. A presença na lista World Monuments Watch estimula autoridades locais e comunidades a tomarem um papel activo na protecção do seu património cultural e, quando necessário, ajuda também a angariar fundos para a sua salvaguarda. Os monumentos são seleccionados, de entre as várias candidaturas apresentadas, por um painel de peritos mundiais, incluindo representantes da UNESCO e do ICOMOS.
O JARDIM BOTÂNICO DA UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA foi fundado em 1873 e inaugurado em 1878. O jardim, situado em pleno centro da cidade, foi criado para servir o ensino da Botânica da Faculdade de Ciências. Dentro dos 4.2 hectares do jardim existem importantes colecções, principalmente palmeiras, figueiras e cycas, assim como muitas plantas em perigo. A vegetação luxuriante sub-tropical do jardim desempenha ainda um importantíssimo papel na amenização do clima da cidade, no sequestro de CO2, para além de ser um refúgio para fauna.
Com a ajuda da WMF e a PLATAFORMA EM DEFESA DO JARDIM BOTÂNICO* (formada por 13 ONG) a LIGA DOS AMIGOS DO JARDIM BOTÂNICO continuará a trabalhar na protecção do Jardim. A Plataforma exige a suspensão da actual versão do Plano de Pormenor e a sua substituição por uma solução mais consensual, menos intrusiva para o Jardim e a cidade.
As pontuais alterações realizadas após consulta pública são mínimas e inócuas, não reflectindo a ampla e qualificada participação da sociedade civil. A CÂMARA MUNICIPAL DE LISBOA optou por retirar questões pontuais demitindo-se de fazer uma reflexão mais conceptual e de fundo como era pedido pelas 13 (treze) organizações não governamentais da PLATAFORMA EM DEFESA DO JARDIM BOTÂNICO.
Fazemos votos para que a ASSEMBLEIA MUNICIPAL DE LISBOA se junte à chamada de atenção da WMF e promova uma genuína revisão do Plano de Pormenor. A versão do Plano aprovado não reflecte as visões e aspirações dos cidadãos. O JARDIM BOTÂNICO e a sua envolvente merecem mais e melhor. Precisamos de um Plano de Pormenor mas não deste.
É uma responsabilidade de todos garantir que o JARDIM BOTÂNICO continue a ser um lugar do saber, da investigação e de recreio para as gerações futuras. A cidade não pode ser feita contra os cidadãos mas COM os cidadãos.
Para mais informações, por favor contactar:
LIGA DOS AMIGOS DO JARDIM BOTÂNICO
TM: 919256973 ou TM. 935587982
amigosdobotanico@gmail.com
*PLATAFORMA EM DEFESA DO JARDIM BOTÂNICO DE LISBOA:
Associação Árvores de Portugal
APAP - Associação Portuguesa dos Arquitectos Paisagistas
AAP - Associação dos Arqueólogos Portugueses.
Associação Portuguesa de Jardins e Sítios Históricos
Associação Lisboa Verde
Cidadãos pelo Capitólio
Fórum Cidadania Lx
GECoRPA - Grémio do Património
Grupo dos Amigos da Tapada das Necessidades
LAJB - Liga dos Amigos do Jardim Botânico
OPRURB - Ofícios do Património e da Reabilitação Urbana
Quercus - Núcleo de Lisboa
LPN - Liga para a Protecção da Natureza
Friday, September 30, 2011
ZURIQUE: Tram operators can turn traffic lights in their favor as they approach, forcing cars to halt
Pedestrians and trams are given priority treatment in Zurich. Tram operators can turn traffic lights in their favor as they approach, forcing cars to halt.
ZURICH — While American cities are synchronizing green lights to improve traffic flow and offering apps to help drivers find parking, many European cities are doing the opposite: creating environments openly hostile to cars. The methods vary, but the mission is clear — to make car use expensive and just plain miserable enough to tilt drivers toward more environmentally friendly modes of transportation.
Cities including Vienna to Munich and Copenhagen have closed vast swaths of streets to car traffic. Barcelona and Paris have had car lanes eroded by popular bike-sharing programs. Drivers in London and Stockholm pay hefty congestion charges just for entering the heart of the city. And over the past two years, dozens of German cities have joined a national network of “environmental zones” where only cars with low carbon dioxide emissions may enter. Likeminded cities welcome new shopping malls and apartment buildings but severely restrict the allowable number of parking spaces. On-street parking is vanishing. In recent years, even former car capitals like Munich have evolved into “walkers’ paradises,” said Lee Schipper, a senior research engineer at Stanford University who specializes in sustainable transportation. “In the United States, there has been much more of a tendency to adapt cities to accommodate driving,” said Peder Jensen, head of the Energy and Transport Group at the European Environment Agency. “Here there has been more movement to make cities more livable for people, to get cities relatively free of cars.”
To that end, the municipal Traffic Planning Department here in Zurich has been working overtime in recent years to torment drivers. Closely spaced red lights have been added on roads into town, causing delays and angst for commuters. Pedestrian underpasses that once allowed traffic to flow freely across major intersections have been removed. Operators in the city’s ever expanding tram system can turn traffic lights in their favor as they approach, forcing cars to halt.
Around Löwenplatz, one of Zurich’s busiest squares, cars are now banned on many blocks. Where permitted, their speed is limited to a snail’s pace so that crosswalks and crossing signs can be removed entirely, giving people on foot the right to cross anywhere they like at any time. As he stood watching a few cars inch through a mass of bicycles and pedestrians, the city’s chief traffic planner, Andy Fellmann, smiled. “Driving is a stop-and-go experience,” he said. “That’s what we like! Our goal is to reconquer public space for pedestrians, not to make it easy for drivers.”
While some American cities — notably San Francisco, which has “pedestrianized” parts of Market Street — have made similar efforts, they are still the exception in the United States, where it has been difficult to get people to imagine a life where cars are not entrenched, Dr. Schipper said.
Europe’s cities generally have stronger incentives to act. Built for the most part before the advent of cars, their narrow roads are poor at handling heavy traffic. Public transportation is generally better in Europe than in the United States, and gas often costs over $8 a gallon, contributing to driving costs that are two to three times greater per mile than in the United States, Dr. Schipper said.
What is more, European Union countries probably cannot meet a commitment under the Kyoto Protocol to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions unless they curb driving. The United States never ratified that pact.
Globally, emissions from transportation continue a relentless rise, with half of them coming from personal cars. Yet an important impulse behind Europe’s traffic reforms will be familiar to mayors in Los Angeles and Vienna alike: to make cities more inviting, with cleaner air and less traffic.
Michael Kodransky, global research manager at the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy in New York, which works with cities to reduce transport emissions, said that Europe was previously “on the same trajectory as the United States, with more people wanting to own more cars.” But in the past decade, there had been “a conscious shift in thinking, and firm policy,” he said. And it is having an effect.
After two decades of car ownership, Hans Von Matt, 52, who works in the insurance industry, sold his vehicle and now gets around Zurich by tram or bicycle, using a car-sharing service for trips out of the city. Carless households have increased from 40 to 45 percent in the last decade, and car owners use their vehicles less, city statistics show.
“There were big fights over whether to close this road or not — but now it is closed, and people got used to it,” he said, alighting from his bicycle on Limmatquai, a riverside pedestrian zone lined with cafes that used to be two lanes of gridlock. Each major road closing has to be approved in a referendum.
Today 91 percent of the delegates to the Swiss Parliament take the tram to work.
Still, there is grumbling. “There are all these zones where you can only drive 20 or 30 kilometers per hour [about 12 to 18 miles an hour], which is rather stressful,” Thomas Rickli, a consultant, said as he parked his Jaguar in a lot at the edge of town. “It’s useless.”
Urban planners generally agree that a rise in car commuting is not desirable for cities anywhere. Mr. Fellmann calculated that a person using a car took up 115 cubic meters (roughly 4,000 cubic feet) of urban space in Zurich while a pedestrian took three. “So it’s not really fair to everyone else if you take the car,” he said.
European cities also realized they could not meet increasingly strict World Health Organization guidelines for fine-particulate air pollution if cars continued to reign. Many American cities are likewise in “nonattainment” of their Clean Air Act requirements, but that fact “is just accepted here,” said Mr. Kodransky of the New York-based transportation institute.
It often takes extreme measures to get people out of their cars, and providing good public transportation is a crucial first step. One novel strategy in Europe is intentionally making it harder and more costly to park. “Parking is everywhere in the United States, but it’s disappearing from the urban space in Europe,” said Mr. Kodransky, whose recent report “Europe’s Parking U-Turn” surveys the shift.
Sihl City, a new Zurich mall, is three times the size of Brooklyn’s Atlantic Mall but has only half the number of parking spaces, and as a result, 70 percent of visitors get there by public transport, Mr. Kodransky said.
In Copenhagen, Mr. Jensen, at the European Environment Agency, said that his office building had more than 150 spaces for bicycles and only one for a car, to accommodate a disabled person. While many building codes in Europe cap the number of parking spaces in new buildings to discourage car ownership, American codes conversely tend to stipulate a minimum number. New apartment complexes built along the light rail line in Denver devote their bottom eight floors to parking, making it “too easy” to get in the car rather than take advantage of rail transit, Mr. Kodransky said.
While Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has generated controversy in New York by “pedestrianizing” a few areas like Times Square, many European cities have already closed vast areas to car traffic. Store owners in Zurich had worried that the closings would mean a drop in business, but that fear has proved unfounded, Mr. Fellmann said, because pedestrian traffic increased 30 to 40 percent where cars were banned.
With politicians and most citizens still largely behind them, Zurich’s planners continue their traffic-taming quest, shortening the green-light periods and lengthening the red with the goal that pedestrians wait no more than 20 seconds to cross. “We would never synchronize green lights for cars with our philosophy,” said Pio Marzolini, a city official. “When I’m in other cities, I feel like I’m always waiting to cross a street. I can’t get used to the idea that I am worth less than a car.”
in THE NEW YORK TIMES 26 June 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/27/science/earth/27traffic.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=europe
FOTO: Eléctricos "presos" na Rua dos Fanqueiros devido ao excesso de estacionamento à superfície que ainda existe na Baixa, Lisboa. É todo um paradigma de mobilidade, de estilos d evida, que tem de ser profundamente altertado em Portugal.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Monday, September 19, 2011
Sunday, September 18, 2011
O exemplo de Munique: Gartnerplatz
Monday, September 5, 2011
Saturday, August 27, 2011
FREDERICO RESSANO GARCIA (Lisboa, 12 Novembro 1847 - Lisboa 27 Agosto 1911)
Hoje em dia é já unânime que o Plano das Avenidas Novas de Ressano Garcia está numa situação de crise porque os seus princípios fundadores foram esquecidos ou até mesmo desvirtuados. Um exemplo bem revelador é dado pelo estado em que se encontram as placas centrais dos arruamentos, criados à maneira de Alamedas arborizadas para o conforto dos peões. Actualmente estão todas, sem excepção, invadidas pelo estacionamento de viaturas de transporte individual ou foram prontamente destruídas pelos engenheiros de tráfego para dar lugar a mais faixas de rodagem. A outrora densamente arborizada Avenida da Republica, que podemos ver nas imagens de arquivo, está hoje reduzida a poucas dezenas de árvores de alinhamento. Os interiores dos quarteirões foram destruídos com a ocupação selvagem de novas construções onde se incluem garagens em caves. Quanto à Arquitectura, ao parque construído do periodo Romântico, a situação é muito preocupante. Desde a década de 70 do séc. XX que se iniciou uma fase galopante de demolições de imóveis e quarteirões de referência da arquitectura da capital (vários prémios Valmor foram já demolidos). Salvo raras excepções, a capital entrou em perda sempre que as pioneiras construções deram lugar a novos imóveis. A embaraçante baixa qualidade arquitectónica do que se tem erguido é um facto. Com o aproximar do final do séc. XX, o Plano das Avenidas Novas foi sendo amputado de páginas importantes da sua história, desvirtuado nos seus princípios urbanísticos, e desqualificado com novas intervenções sem mais valias para o futuro da cidade.
Estamos perante mais uma obra planeada por Ressano Garcia. É outro arruamento emblemático da capital em crise, com graves problemas ambientais e em rápida transformação - raramente sinónimo de qualidade. Parece não existir a reflexão teórica prévia que a sua importância histórica naturalmente exige. Exemplo disso é a recente intervenção pueril (e ilegal) no mobiliário urbano oitocentista da avenida levado a cabo pela própria CML de mãos dadas com uma marca de tintas ávida de publicidade.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Jornadas Europeias do Património 2011: Património e Paisagem Urbana
23, 24 e 25 de Setembro de 2011
Património e Paisagem Urbana
Nos dias 23, 24 e 25 de Setembro celebram-se, em Portugal, as Jornadas Europeias do Património, este ano sob o tema PATRIMÒNIO E PAISAGEM URBANA. Tal como nas edições dos anos anteriores, o IGESPAR, enquanto coordenador nacional, convida todas as entidades públicas e privadas que de algum modo estejam relacionadas com o Património, a associarem-se a esta acção.
Thursday, August 18, 2011
Saturday, August 13, 2011
DEMOLIÇÃO INTEGRAL até na Praça da Estrela?
Mais um exemplo, proposto para demolição integral, desta vez em plena ZEP da Basílica da Estrela! A destruição do património arquitectónico do séc. XIX/XX não parece ter fim. O que restará de Lisboa se a CML e o IGESPAR aprovarem a demolição de todos estes imóveis correntes da Lisboa Romântica? Tomados isoladamente são banais e simples mas é no papel que desempenham num conjunto urbano que reside a sua importância para o bairro e cidade. Porquê demolir este prédio recuperável? Sabemos que é possível - e corrente nas cidades da Europa desenvolvida - reconverter, adaptar, remodelar, modernizar os interiores deste tipo de imóveis. Mas em Lisboa cada vez mais se opta pela lógica da tábua rasa, pelo apagar da memória colectiva. Lisboa é cada vez mais uma cidade anti-restauro, anti-conservação. E já são poucos os casos que consideram a outrora popular "solução" simplista e pueril da "manutenção da fachada" (salvo na Baixa e Chiado, por enquanto!). Afinal, tudo se reduz à especulação dos solos da cidade e à imposição de estilos de vida contrários à cidade histórica. E isso fica bem claro pelo modo como os proprietários estão a vender este prédio, considerado apenas como mero "lote de terreno" para construção nova:
«Edifício para demolição integral com projecto em apreciação na CML para 2 T4 Duplex com estacionamento. Área de construção 716 m2. Excelente localização.»
Friday, August 5, 2011
The good, the bad and the ugly of cut-price tourism
As high summer approaches, it’s easy to resent the summer tourist hordes on your turf, but for many in Portugal, the increasing number of visitors is a welcome sign that their country is still open for business.According to Paulo Rita, MA director at the ISCTE Business School Lisbon, incoming tourist receipts went up 8.7 per cent between January and April compared with the same period last year. Last year, the number of foreign tourists had already risen by 6 per cent, recovering most of 2009′s 8 per cent fall, while hotel revenues increased 3 per cent. British, German, Spanish and French holidaymakers accounted for nearly two-thirds of all international tourists – significantly, at a time when the number of people travelling from those countries decreased.
Allan Katz, the US ambassador to Portugal, says the country should be targeting the American market, as it has everything it is looking for (“old things, good food, good wine”).Europe’s other troubled members, Greece and Ireland, are seeing a similar boost in visitors, given the weak euro (a draw for visitors from the US), VAT rate slashes for tourists in both nations (down from 13.5 per cent to 9 per cent in Ireland), and price reductions on tourist attractions and hotel rooms.
“It is understandable that when facing macroeconomic difficulties, firms try to entice consumers with severe price reductions due to more fierce competition,” Rita says.
This popularity has its downsides, however. TAP, Portugal’s flag carrier, has lost billions in the last four years thanks in no small part to the rise in budget airlines, namely easyJet, which has settled in at Lisbon’s Portela airport. Ryanair, which has bases in Porto and Faro, has also made public its interest in having a third base in Lisbon. TAP has lost many passengers on routes to London and Paris because of, it believes, aggressive marketing techniques and skewed perception; the airline is not that much more expensive than low-cost providers.
“If we go too far down the cut-price holiday path, margins will become too narrow because of substantial price cuts,” warns Rita. “If companies are cutting costs significantly, this will undoubtedly affect service quality.”
Luís Faria, co-founder of think-tank Contraditório, points out that the last few decades has seen a number of different sectors successively elected as the catchall solution to economic problems, without much success – tourism being the evergreen “holy grail”.
“The role of government should be to remain sector-neutral and to unleash entrepreneurial energies across the board,” he says. “In tourism, like in any other sector, new practices should emerge by ongoing experimentation. Instead of showing what the ‘right way’ is, Portuguese people should be given the opportunity to fish when the fish are there – not just when the weather is good.” Monocle, July 28, 2011, Writer: Syma Tariq
Fotos: low-end em Lisboa. Alojamento no Rossio e esplanada em Alfama. A qualidade que ainda falta ao Turismo na capital.
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Festival dos Oceanos no MUSEU do TEATRO ROMANO

Inserido no Festival dos Oceanos, evento que decorrerá na cidade de Lisboa entre os dias 30 de Julho a 13 de Agosto, o Museu do Teatro Romano associa-se a este evento através do alargamento do período de abertura - até às 24h, nos dias 4 e 11 de Agosto. Nestes dias, haverá visitas guiadas às 18.30h onde serão divulgados os mais recentes resultados das últimas campanhas arqueológicas.Sunday, July 31, 2011
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Across Europe, Irking Drivers Is Urban Policy
Pedestrians and trams are given priority treatment in Zurich. Tram operators can turn traffic lights in their favor as they approach, forcing cars to halt.
ZURICH — While American cities are synchronizing green lights to improve traffic flow and offering apps to help drivers find parking, many European cities are doing the opposite: creating environments openly hostile to cars. The methods vary, but the mission is clear — to make car use expensive and just plain miserable enough to tilt drivers toward more environmentally friendly modes of transportation.
Cities including Vienna to Munich and Copenhagen have closed vast swaths of streets to car traffic. Barcelona and Paris have had car lanes eroded by popular bike-sharing programs. Drivers in London and Stockholm pay hefty congestion charges just for entering the heart of the city. And over the past two years, dozens of German cities have joined a national network of “environmental zones” where only cars with low carbon dioxide emissions may enter. Likeminded cities welcome new shopping malls and apartment buildings but severely restrict the allowable number of parking spaces. On-street parking is vanishing. In recent years, even former car capitals like Munich have evolved into “walkers’ paradises,” said Lee Schipper, a senior research engineer at Stanford University who specializes in sustainable transportation. “In the United States, there has been much more of a tendency to adapt cities to accommodate driving,” said Peder Jensen, head of the Energy and Transport Group at the European Environment Agency. “Here there has been more movement to make cities more livable for people, to get cities relatively free of cars.”
To that end, the municipal Traffic Planning Department here in Zurich has been working overtime in recent years to torment drivers. Closely spaced red lights have been added on roads into town, causing delays and angst for commuters. Pedestrian underpasses that once allowed traffic to flow freely across major intersections have been removed. Operators in the city’s ever expanding tram system can turn traffic lights in their favor as they approach, forcing cars to halt.
Around Löwenplatz, one of Zurich’s busiest squares, cars are now banned on many blocks. Where permitted, their speed is limited to a snail’s pace so that crosswalks and crossing signs can be removed entirely, giving people on foot the right to cross anywhere they like at any time. As he stood watching a few cars inch through a mass of bicycles and pedestrians, the city’s chief traffic planner, Andy Fellmann, smiled. “Driving is a stop-and-go experience,” he said. “That’s what we like! Our goal is to reconquer public space for pedestrians, not to make it easy for drivers.”
While some American cities — notably San Francisco, which has “pedestrianized” parts of Market Street — have made similar efforts, they are still the exception in the United States, where it has been difficult to get people to imagine a life where cars are not entrenched, Dr. Schipper said.
Europe’s cities generally have stronger incentives to act. Built for the most part before the advent of cars, their narrow roads are poor at handling heavy traffic. Public transportation is generally better in Europe than in the United States, and gas often costs over $8 a gallon, contributing to driving costs that are two to three times greater per mile than in the United States, Dr. Schipper said.
What is more, European Union countries probably cannot meet a commitment under the Kyoto Protocol to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions unless they curb driving. The United States never ratified that pact.
Globally, emissions from transportation continue a relentless rise, with half of them coming from personal cars. Yet an important impulse behind Europe’s traffic reforms will be familiar to mayors in Los Angeles and Vienna alike: to make cities more inviting, with cleaner air and less traffic.
Michael Kodransky, global research manager at the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy in New York, which works with cities to reduce transport emissions, said that Europe was previously “on the same trajectory as the United States, with more people wanting to own more cars.” But in the past decade, there had been “a conscious shift in thinking, and firm policy,” he said. And it is having an effect.
After two decades of car ownership, Hans Von Matt, 52, who works in the insurance industry, sold his vehicle and now gets around Zurich by tram or bicycle, using a car-sharing service for trips out of the city. Carless households have increased from 40 to 45 percent in the last decade, and car owners use their vehicles less, city statistics show.
“There were big fights over whether to close this road or not — but now it is closed, and people got used to it,” he said, alighting from his bicycle on Limmatquai, a riverside pedestrian zone lined with cafes that used to be two lanes of gridlock. Each major road closing has to be approved in a referendum.
Today 91 percent of the delegates to the Swiss Parliament take the tram to work.
Still, there is grumbling. “There are all these zones where you can only drive 20 or 30 kilometers per hour [about 12 to 18 miles an hour], which is rather stressful,” Thomas Rickli, a consultant, said as he parked his Jaguar in a lot at the edge of town. “It’s useless.”
Urban planners generally agree that a rise in car commuting is not desirable for cities anywhere. Mr. Fellmann calculated that a person using a car took up 115 cubic meters (roughly 4,000 cubic feet) of urban space in Zurich while a pedestrian took three. “So it’s not really fair to everyone else if you take the car,” he said.
European cities also realized they could not meet increasingly strict World Health Organization guidelines for fine-particulate air pollution if cars continued to reign. Many American cities are likewise in “nonattainment” of their Clean Air Act requirements, but that fact “is just accepted here,” said Mr. Kodransky of the New York-based transportation institute.
It often takes extreme measures to get people out of their cars, and providing good public transportation is a crucial first step. One novel strategy in Europe is intentionally making it harder and more costly to park. “Parking is everywhere in the United States, but it’s disappearing from the urban space in Europe,” said Mr. Kodransky, whose recent report “Europe’s Parking U-Turn” surveys the shift.
Sihl City, a new Zurich mall, is three times the size of Brooklyn’s Atlantic Mall but has only half the number of parking spaces, and as a result, 70 percent of visitors get there by public transport, Mr. Kodransky said.
In Copenhagen, Mr. Jensen, at the European Environment Agency, said that his office building had more than 150 spaces for bicycles and only one for a car, to accommodate a disabled person. While many building codes in Europe cap the number of parking spaces in new buildings to discourage car ownership, American codes conversely tend to stipulate a minimum number. New apartment complexes built along the light rail line in Denver devote their bottom eight floors to parking, making it “too easy” to get in the car rather than take advantage of rail transit, Mr. Kodransky said.
While Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has generated controversy in New York by “pedestrianizing” a few areas like Times Square, many European cities have already closed vast areas to car traffic. Store owners in Zurich had worried that the closings would mean a drop in business, but that fear has proved unfounded, Mr. Fellmann said, because pedestrian traffic increased 30 to 40 percent where cars were banned.
With politicians and most citizens still largely behind them, Zurich’s planners continue their traffic-taming quest, shortening the green-light periods and lengthening the red with the goal that pedestrians wait no more than 20 seconds to cross.
“We would never synchronize green lights for cars with our philosophy,” said Pio Marzolini, a city official. “When I’m in other cities, I feel like I’m always waiting to cross a street. I can’t get used to the idea that I am worth less than a car.”
in THE NEW YORK TIMES 26 June 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/27/science/earth/27traffic.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=europe
FOTO: Eléctrico no centro de Munique